Legal Opinion
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. v. Flatiron AECOM, LLC
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 9, 2024No. 1:19-cv-02811Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 19-cv-2811-WJM-KAS AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant, v. FLATIRON | AECOM, LLC, Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff. ORDER DENYING FLATIRON’S MOTION IN LIMINE Before the Court is Defendant Flatiron AECOM, LLC’s (“Flatiron”) Motion in Limine (“Flatiron MIL”) (ECF No. 301) and AECOM’s response (ECF No. 313). For the following reasons, Flatiron’s MIL is denied. I. LEGAL STANDARD “The admission or exclusion of evidence lies within the sound discretion of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lewis R. Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Towerridge, Inc., Sued as United States of America for the Benefit of Towerridge, Inc., and v. T.A.O., Inc., and Mid-Continent Casualty Co., AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Bobby Ray GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Vanderbeek v. Vernon Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- SOLIDFX, LLC v. Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.