Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 10, 1944No. Nos. 8453, 8454PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Associate Justice.

Plaintiff is the assignee of one Jewett who filed an application for a patent in 1933. The discovery involved is the process of obtaining a colored coating on granules, at comparatively low temperature, which will not form efflorescent salt under adverse weather conditions and thus wash away or discolor. The product is principally useful as a roofing material.

This is a suit under Section 4915, R.S., 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to compel the allowance of a large number of claims, all of them intended to enlarge the scope of a patent approved in 1939 by the District Court of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Monsanto Chemical Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. Hoover Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  3. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Skil Corporation v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  2. Skil Corporation v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API