Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas Jennings

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 3, 2013No. 11-50315, 11-50325PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:

Defendants appeal the application of a two-level enhancement imposed by the district court in determining their sentences following convictions for tax fraud, because their offenses involved “sophisticated means,” under section 2Tl.l(b)(2) of the federal Sentencing Guidelines. 1 We affirm the district court’s application of the enhancement. Conduct need not involve highly complex schemes or exhibit exceptional brilliance to justify a sophisticated means enhancement. Defendants’ effort to conceal income by using a bank account with a deceptive name was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Ephraim LewisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. James Fife and Karen KrahnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. O'DohertyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Kevin WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Adetokunbo AdepojuCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Eric VallejosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Neil A. ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Patricia FountainCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API