Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Citizens Bank v. Davis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 22, 1925No. 11807Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Cothran

(concurring) : I think that the modification of the decree of foreclosure by this Court, by the opinion found in 126 S. C., 175; 119 S. E., 580, was too trivial to deprive the opinion of its character as an affirmance of the decree; it amounted to a substantial affirmance; therefore the defendants are liable upon their appeal bond.

The facts in the main cause are set forth in the opinion above referred to and need not be here repeated. It is sufficient to say that the action was for the foreclosure of certain mortgages, to which the defendants mortgagors set up various defenses, none of which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Citizens Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API