Legal Opinion
Camaro Trading v. Nissei Sangyo America
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 3, 1993No. 1920710PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nissei Sangyo America, Ltd. ("Nissei"), filed this declaratory judgment action against Camaro Trading Company, Ltd. ("Camaro"), seeking a declaration that a contract entered into by Nissei and Camaro was void on the basis that Camaro, a Hong Kong corporation, was doing business in Alabama without being qualified to do so.
The procedural history of this case is somewhat complicated. Camaro removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on diversity grounds. That court remanded the case to the state courts for lack of federal jurisdiction, specifically…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. BlalockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Sar Manufacturing Co. v. Dumas Bros. Mfg.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Kentucky Galv. Co., Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- SANWA BUSINESS CR. CORP. v. GB" Boots" Smith Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Diversacon Industries, Inc. v. National Bank of Commerce of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nissei Sangyo America, Limited v. United States of America, Appeal of Camaro Trading Company, Limited, Proposed Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Ishler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Ishler v. CommissionerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2006
- Brown v. Pool Depot, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- COMMUNITY CARE OF AMERICA OF ALA. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002