Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co. v. Lester
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from District Court, Harris County; ■Chas. E. Ashe, Judge. Action by J. E. Lester and another against the Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
Plaintiff in error issued to J. E. Lester and Gohlman, Lester & Co., defendants in error, the owners of certain shares of the capital stock of the Standard Compress Company, of the par value of $43,-000, an insurance policy, insuring them in the sum of $10,750, against all direct loss or damage by Are on the profits derived from the dividends on said stock. The capital stock of said company was $100,000. The policy contained the following provisions:
“It is understood that for three years prior hereto that the said Standard Compress Company of Houston, Texas, has earned a dividend of 25 per…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wagner & Chabot v. Westchester Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Wolfe v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EndeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HeidenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Continental Insurance v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lee v. Mutual Protective Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Fidelity Union Fire Ins. Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Superior Insurance Company v. KlingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959