Legal Opinion

Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co. v. Lester

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1915No. 450PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Harris County; ■Chas. E. Ashe, Judge. Action by J. E. Lester and another against the Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Plaintiff in error issued to J. E. Lester and Gohlman, Lester & Co., defendants in error, the owners of certain shares of the capital stock of the Standard Compress Company, of the par value of $43,-000, an insurance policy, insuring them in the sum of $10,750, against all direct loss or damage by Are on the profits derived from the dividends on said stock. The capital stock of said company was $100,000. The policy contained the following provisions:

“It is understood that for three years prior hereto that the said Standard Compress Company of Houston, Texas, has earned a dividend of 25 per…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wagner & Chabot v. Westchester Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Wolfe v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EndeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HeidenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Continental Insurance v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lee v. Mutual Protective Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Fidelity Union Fire Ins. Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Superior Insurance Company v. KlingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API