Legal Opinion

Gantt v. Bamberg

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 30, 1986No. 85-30PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

This appeal is from a decree fixing the boundary line between coterminous landowners. We affirm.

Plaintiff Gantt brought the action against the Bambergs, alleging that a dispute existed between the parties as to the true location of the boundary line between them and asking the court to fix the line. The defendants, by answer, admitted that a dispute existed as to the true location of the boundary line.

The plaintiff’s evidence consisted of her testimony and that of two surveyors, one of whom, Larry Speaks, she had retained to locate the line. His survey was offered on behalf of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. FIRST SOUTHERN FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN ASS'N OF MOBILE v. NicrosiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Town of Helena v. Country Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Hayes v. CotterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Cedarwood Assoc., L.T.D. v. TrammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Creel v. CrimCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  2. Jeffreys v. JeffreysCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API