Legal Opinion
State v. Bertram
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 26, 1972No. 1 CA-CR 422PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUBANK, Judge.
The sole question for our determination on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of a warrantless search of the defendant’s automobile.
On May 12, 1970, the defendant was arrested for several crimes, including the possession of marijuana in violation of A. R.S. § 36-1002.05. Preliminary hearing was held before the justice of the peace and the defendant was held to answer the possession of marijuana charge only. On October 16, 1970, appellant moved to suppress evidence relating to the possession charge.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. DunnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
- State v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Brown v. SUPERIOR CT. OF CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Brown v. SUPERIOR CT. OF CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.