Legal Opinion

Mitan v. Campbell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2005No. Docket 126451PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Per curiam

The question before us in this defamation case is whether the period of limitations 1 runs from the date of the alleged defamatory statement made by defendant or the date the statement was republished by a third party. We conclude that the limitations period ran from the date of the original alleged defamatory statement. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the circuit court’s judgment of summary disposition.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant was the public relations director of the Department of Consumer and Industry Services. On February 22, 2000,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Stephens v. DixonMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Rouch v. Enquirer & NewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ledl v. Quik Pik Food Stores, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Grimes v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. McKee v. CosbyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. Thomas M. Cooley Law School v. Kurzon Strauss, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. Thomas M Cooley Law School v. Doe 1Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Catherine Puetz Md v. Spectrum Health HospitalsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API