Legal Opinion · Concurrence

New York Life Insurance v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 18, 1936No. 32,493Published

1ConcurrenceHarvey, J.

I concur in the order denying appellant’s petition, but prefer to state the facts as I understand them and my reasons as follows: Plaintiff had foreclosed its real-estate mortgage. The trial court, acting under the moratorium statute, made an order extending the time in which defendant might redeem. Plaintiff appealed from that order, contending it was *282erroneous under the facts disclosed by the record. This court agreed with that contention and reversed the ruling of the trial court. Defendant moved this court for a rehearing, and, in the alternative, requested this court to grant thirty to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Case v. Cherokee Lanyon Spelter Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API