Legal Opinion

Spezio v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The judgment properly declared that the defendant insurance company is required to defend the action brought against the plaintiffs-respondents Leo Spezio and Joseph Spezio. It was error to have included the plaintiff-respondent Virginia Suraee as a party covered by the so-called homeowner’s policy. The definition of insured under the policy includes: “ (a) the named Insured, (b) if residents of his household, his spouse, the relatives of either and any other person under the age…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bashor v. Excess InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API