Spezio v. Travelers Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The judgment properly declared that the defendant insurance company is required to defend the action brought against the plaintiffs-respondents Leo Spezio and Joseph Spezio. It was error to have included the plaintiff-respondent Virginia Suraee as a party covered by the so-called homeowner’s policy. The definition of insured under the policy includes: “ (a) the named Insured, (b) if residents of his household, his spouse, the relatives of either and any other person under the age…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Bashor v. Excess InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982