Legal Opinion

Grumet v. Pataki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Spain, J.

The legislation challenged in this action, chapter 390 of the *33Laws of 1997, is the most recent in a series of attempts by the Legislature to create a constitutionally valid educational program which meets the special education needs of the disabled students residing in the Village of Kiryas Joel, Orange County. The Village, which lies entirely within the boundaries of the Monroe-Woodbury Central School District, is a community established by members of the Satmar Hasidic sect. When created, the Village boundaries were drawn to include only property owned and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Lynch v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. School District of Grand Rapids v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. v. GrumetSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grumet v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Bennett v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. New York State Higher Education Services Corp. v. FeherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Xhika v. Rocky Point Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Grumet v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API