Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Howard, No. Cv00-0176368s (Oct. 17, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 17, 2000No. CV00-0176368SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE # 101

The plaintiff, Lillian MacDonald, filed a three count complaint alleging abuse of process and two emotional distress claims against the defendant, William Howard as an individual and as the executor of the estate of Hedwig Williams. The defendant moves to strike all three counts. In reviewing a motion to strike, "we must read the allegations of the complaint generously to sustain its viability, if possible. . . . We must, therefore, . . . construe the complaint in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Ancona v. Manafort Bros.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Long v. LongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. Wells v. Waukesha County Marine BankCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API