Legal Opinion

Westbrook v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 15, 2014No. 3D14-2226PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

' PER CURIAM.

We affirm without further discussion the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, we write to place Appellant Ananias Westbrook on notice that the issue in the instant appeal has been raised by him in prior motions filed with the trial court and in prior appeals filed with this court, and has been resolved on the merits adversely to Appellant. See Westbrook v. State, 122 So.3d 378 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013); Westbrook v. State, 116 So.3d 391 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). The filing of repetitive motions, and the prosecution of repetitive appeals, seeking…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Spencer v. Florida Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Marc v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ANANIAS WESTBROOK v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
  2. ANANIAS WESTBROOK v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
  3. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API