Legal Opinion

State v. Leutenegger

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 24, 2004No. 03-0133-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundsten, J.

¶ 1. This case involves the exigent circumstances exception to the general requirement that an officer have a warrant before making a nonconsensual entry into a home. A police officer entered Walter Leutenegger's garage without a warrant after receiving information indicating that Leutenegger was highly intoxicated and locating him in his car in his garage. Leutenegger was subsequently arrested, prosecuted, and convicted of driving while intoxicated. Leutenegger appeals, arguing that the circuit court should have suppressed evidence obtained after the officer entered his garage because that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BoggessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Brett W. DumstreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
  4. State v. MaddixCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  5. State v. DumstreyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API