Legal Opinion

Ogden Allied Services v. Panesso

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 4, 1993No. 92-651PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBSTER, Judge.

In this workers’ compensation ease, the employer and servicing agent seek review of an order refusing to allow them to introduce into evidence surveillance films taken of claimant. We conclude that the order was erroneous. Accordingly, we reverse.

There is no dispute regarding the relevant facts. In March 1991, the parties signed (and the judge approved) a pretrial stipulation on which counsel for the employer and servicing agent noted his intent to call impeachment and rebuttal witnesses, but did not specifically identify any surveillance witness or exhibit. On May 23, 1991,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mobley v. Fulford Van & StorageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Calleyro v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Costanzo v. Pik n' Run 4District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Ogden Allied Services v. PanessoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API