Farrain Joseph Comeaux A/K/A Farrain J. Comeaux v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.
A jury found Farrain Joseph Comeaux 1 guilty of burglarizing a habitation. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 30.02(a)(1), (c)(2) (West 2011). Comeaux raises five issues in his appeal. We conclude that none of Comeaux’s issues entitle him to receive a new trial or require his acquittal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment..
Jury Selection
In issue one, Comeaux complains that the trial court erred by denying the challenge for cause that he lodged against prospective juror 23 (PJ 23). During jury selection, PJ 23 informed Comeaux’s attorney that he had been burglarized.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Conner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Comeaux, Farrain JosephCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Comeaux, Farrain JosephCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Harris, James Jr.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
- Nicholas David Mosquera v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2023
- Norvell Norman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.