Bettis v. Townsend
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in the Superior Court of the*' County of Tehama. Keyser, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court:
The Court below found that the Independent Order of Odd Fellows of Red Bluff, a corporation duly incorporated, loaned to the defendant the sum of seven hundred dollars for the purpose of redeeming real estate (described in the complaint) the property of one R S. Bettis, for the benefit of the plaintiffs, who are the children of said Bettis.
That at the time of making the loan defendant accepted the same for the purpose of redeeming the real estate for the benefit of Bettis and his children, and agreed, in case the property should be sold for more than the loan due the bank, and other…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Robertson v. BurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Forni v. YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- McBrown v. DaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People's State Bank of Tyler v. Monsey Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- In re Rose's EstateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.