Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Goldstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 10, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent, an unmarried daughter of appellant, living in his household, twenty-three years of age, working and earning wages, brought suit against her father and recovered the judgment appealed from for damages for personal injuries received while riding in an automobile operated by her father, as is alleged, in a negligent manner.

*712There are two grounds of appeal, namety, error in the refusal to nonsuit and error in refusal to direct a verdict in favor of appellant. Both are based upon the ground that respondent had not been emancipated and, therefore, could 'not have her action against her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Local Board of Health v. EastlackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reingold v. ReingoldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Burdick v. GrimshawNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. Straver v. StraverNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  4. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  5. Turner v. McCuneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API