Legal Opinion
Medlock v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 31, 1994No. S94A0769PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hunstein, Justice.
Following a hearing conducted pursuant to our remand of this case in Medlock v. State, 263 Ga. 246 (430 SE2d 754) (1993), the trial court ruled that the State had demonstrated that, in questioning two *698defense character witnesses during Medlock’s trial about earlier criminal charges brought against Medlock, the prosecutor had acted in good faith and that his questioning was based on reliable information that could be supported by admissible evidence. See id. at (2). See also Christenson v. State, 261 Ga. 80 (8) (c) (402 SE2d 41) (1991). Medlock appeals from that ruling. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Christenson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Dover v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Medlock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Copeland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Dover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wellons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Glass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Presnell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Glean v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.