Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. King

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1998No. Nos. 98-423 and 98-424PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. However, we disagree with the board’s recommenda*177tions. We suspend King for one-year and stay the suspension on condition that, during the probation period, he work with a mentor appointed by relator. We suspend Pope for six months and stay the suspension. Costs taxed to respondents.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs as to Pope but dissents as to King and joins the Chief Justice’s dissent only as to King. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. StatzerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrocklerOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Columbus Bar Assn. v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. StatzerOhio Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API