Legal Opinion

Clancy v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 25, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonnelly, J.

On August 2, 1929, defendant issued to George M. Clancy its $2,000 policy of life insurance. Upon Clancy’s death, on July 29, 1934, it paid this sum to his wife, Mary Clancy, the named beneficiary. Attached to the policy is a supplementary provision for the payment of an additional $2,000 as an accidental death benefit, on conditions set forth. The present action is to recover the additional benefit.

The supplementary provision, so far as pertinent, is as follows: “ If * * * due proof shall be presented at the Home Office of the Company, of the death of the Insured * * * caused solely by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Lovelace v. Travelers' Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Taliaferro v. Travelers' Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  4. Murray v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Stacey's Ex'rsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mansbacher v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. O'Neil v. New York Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Home Beneficial Life Insurance v. PartainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  4. Estate of Dumoulin Ex Rel. Dumoulin v. Cuna Mutual GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API