Clancy v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonnelly, J.
On August 2, 1929, defendant issued to George M. Clancy its $2,000 policy of life insurance. Upon Clancy’s death, on July 29, 1934, it paid this sum to his wife, Mary Clancy, the named beneficiary. Attached to the policy is a supplementary provision for the payment of an additional $2,000 as an accidental death benefit, on conditions set forth. The present action is to recover the additional benefit.
The supplementary provision, so far as pertinent, is as follows: “ If * * * due proof shall be presented at the Home Office of the Company, of the death of the Insured * * * caused solely by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Lovelace v. Travelers' Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Taliaferro v. Travelers' Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Murray v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Stacey's Ex'rsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mansbacher v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- O'Neil v. New York Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Home Beneficial Life Insurance v. PartainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Estate of Dumoulin Ex Rel. Dumoulin v. Cuna Mutual GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 2011