Legal Opinion

Schneeberger v. Dugan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

To recite in detail the facts alleged by the parties would extend this opinion to unwarranted and useless length. It is enough to say that they present issues of fact which may not be determined on a motion for summary judgment. Prime Mfg. Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp. 229 Wis. 348, 281 N. W. 697. Certainly, defendant’s allegations in his amended answer that plaintiff is indebted to him on account of plaintiff’s failure to pay the purchase price of stock sold him, if there were no other defense sufficiently pleaded, and which liability plaintiff seeks to avoid by allegations in his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prime Manufacturing Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Fredrickson v. KabatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Brauchle v. NothhelferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. Martin (In Re Martin)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  2. First Security Bank, Morristown v. SkjoldalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API