Legal Opinion

State v. Crosby

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 1, 2006No. 0112-38549; A120319PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for manslaughter in the first degree. ORS 163.118(l)(c). Her sole assignment of error pertains to the propriety of the trial court’s jury instruction concerning the elements of the offense. She contends that the court’s instruction was erroneous and impermissibly confusing to the jury. We disagree and therefore affirm.

The facts necessary to dispose of the appeal are not in dispute. Defendant lived with her elderly mother, whose health began to decline during the 1990s. In 2001, defendant brought her mother to a hospital emergency room because her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. BarnesOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. MeridethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CrosbyOregon Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API