Legal Opinion
United States v. Kenneth Blankenship
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 7, 1995No. 94-3963PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Kenneth Blankenship entered a conditional plea of guilty to a one-count indictment charging him with being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (1988). He conditioned his plea upon the right to appeal two pretrial orders. Blankenship now appeals the district court’s 1 orders denying his motion to dismiss the indictment based upon the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174, and sustaining the government’s motion to exclude testimony on his alleged justification or coercion defense. We affirm.
I. Background.
The parties stipulated that on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Edgar Cherry GantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Faith Annette Long, United States of America v. Garrett James BarryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Alvin August KramerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Robert HarperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Ronald TitlbachCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Michal Jankowski, United States of America v. Sylwia JankowskiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Kenneth Blankenship v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Keith ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.