Legal Opinion
United States v. Melvin Houston Rigdon
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1972No. 71-1353PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellant, Melvin Houston Rig-don, was tried before a jury and found guilty of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) and (d) (Bank Robbery). On this direct appeal, the appellant challenges the District Court’s denials of his peti*380tions for writs of habeas corpus ad testi-ficandum at government expense pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(b). The appellant requested subpoenas be issued for seven witnesses, all of whom were at the time incarcerated in the Federal Penitentiary in Atlanta, Georgia. All seven requests were denied; however, the appellant has appealed only from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Robert Neil Conder, United States of America v. Bernard Joseph Grogan, United States of America v. William Moore PegramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Norbert D. Terlikowski v. United States of America, James Slawek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- James Joseph Welsh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Stephen M. Speers, Jerry D. Anden, and James v. Sidary, A/K/A Jim Sidney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Ioannou v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. George E. Moore (88-5932) and Charles R. Morse, (88-5942)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Phillip Brooks BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. John Andrew Greschner, Ronnie Joe CriswellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Harold J. GarmanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Louis RinchackCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.