Metz v. Metz

OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

From this action of the trial court error is prosecuted. It will be observed that the order complained of was entered by a judge of the Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations, who also by virtue of *533statute is the Juvenile Judge of Franklin .County. The question presented is whether or not under the facts in this case' the Judge of the Domestic Relations Division of the Common Pleas Court lost jurisdiction to consider and determine the proceedings in aid of execution upon the cause of Metz v Metz, which had been certified by the Common Pleas Court regular…