Legal Opinion

Bautisa v. TAP Air Portugal

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 15, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00503Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAVIER BAUTISTA, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:24-cv-00503 (JLR) -against- ORDER TAP AIR PORTUGAL, Defendant. JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Javier Bautista (“Plaintiff”) has moved this Court to reopen his case, attesting, among other things, that Defendant TAP Air Portugal (“Defendant”) did not serve him with any document from its filings in this Court, including notice of removal. See Dkt. 27 at 1-3, 5, 7. 28 U.S.C. § 1442(d) requires removing defendants to “give written notice” of removal “[p]romptly after the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Sartor v. ToussaintCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API