Sisk v. Parker
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
Appellant has appealed from a judgment rendered against him for damages for breach of contract. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and rendered.
Initially we are confronted with appel-lee’s motion challenging our jurisdiction of this appeal. Previously, as provided by Rule 386, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, appellant had timely filed his verified motion requesting an enlargement of time within which to file the record. In his motion, appellant alleged that the transcript could be completed and timely filed within the initial sixty-day period prescribed by Rule 386,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Radford v. McNenyTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. GossettTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Wigley v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pyle v. Eastern Seed Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
- Horn v. Builders Supply Co. of Longview, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Newsom v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
- Sabine Corp. v. ONG Western, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
- Budge v. PostDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1982
- Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and American Home Assurance Company v. Rotec Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Hanks v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.