Goodman v. Micka
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
This is a declaratory judgment action in which plaintiff sought a determination of the parties’ respective interests in certain real property. ORS 28.010 et seq. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, ORCP 47 C, ruling that no justiciable controversy existed and that plaintiff had “other and more appropriate remedies available.” We reverse.
Plaintiff, as the conservator of the estate of Norman Evonuk, undertook to inventory and value Evonuk’s assets, including real property located in Vida. Defendants, who currently reside at that real property, claimed a tenancy…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Uribe v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tualatin Valley Housing Partners v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- In Re the Marriage of DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- In Re the Marriage of DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004