Legal Opinion

People v. Hardenbrook

California Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1957No. Crim. 5939PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an automatic appeal from' a judgment imposing the death penalty after a jury verdict finding the defendant guilty of first degree murder and fixing the penalty as death. Defendant was found sane by a jury after trial on his plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. The record does not disclose that a motion for a new trial was made by or on behalf of defendant.

Defendant, David J. Hardenbrook, was the adopted son of the victim of the homicide, Mrs. Eleanor Hardenbrook. Defendant admitted both prior to and during the trial that he shot his adoptive mother through the back of the head…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. AmayaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. People v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. KetchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. MilanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API