Legal Opinion
United States v. Mark v. Buckley
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 24, 2001No. 00-3845PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
Holding that obstruction of justice at the sentencing hearing precluded a sentencing discount for acceptance of responsibility, we vacated the defendant’s sentence and remanded for resentencing. 192 F.3d 708 (7th Cir.1999). On remand the district judge duly resentenced Buckley without an acceptance of responsibility discount. This second appeal complains about the judge’s refusal to depart downward on the basis of the defendant’s claimed “extraordinary efforts at post-sentence rehabilitation.” The specific complaint is that the judge thought herself precluded from…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. James F. MooredCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Luiz Ben ZviCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. William Aramony, United States of America v. Thomas J. MerloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Mark A. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Michael L. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Robert R. Krilich, Sr., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002
- United States v. Bradley DearbornCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.