Legal Opinion
(PS) Whitsitt v. Anna
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 2, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01484Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, No. 2:20-cv-01484-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ANNA et al, 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff William J. Whitsitt’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for 18 Reconsideration and Objections to the U.S. Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations 19 (ECF No. 5), which the Court construes together as a Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 60(b). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s 21 Motion (ECF No. 6) is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Walter Bateman v. United States Postal Service William J. Henderson, 1 Postmaster General, and Aaron Johnson Ben Fukumitsu David Burns Jose MallariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.