Legal Opinion

In Re T.A. Brinkoetter & Sons, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided March 28, 2012No. 09-80727PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS L. PERKINS, Chief Judge.

Are penalties and interest assessed when a chapter 11 debtor-in-possession fails to timely pay postpetition fringe benefits entitled to administrative expense status? This is the issue raised in the petition for administrative expenses (treated as a motion under Fed. R. Bankr.P. 9013 and 9014) filed by the NECA-IBEW Pension Fund and the NECA-IBEW Welfare Fund (together the FUNDS).

The Debtor, T.A. Brinkoetter & Sons, Inc. (DEBTOR), a contractor, filed a chapter 11 petition on March 10, 2009, and operated its business as a debtor-in-possession until the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re Roth American, Inc., Debtor. Teamsters Local Union No. 401 Health & Welfare Fund International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 401Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re Unimet Corporation, Debtor. United Steelworkers of America v. Unimet CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. Adventure Resources, Inc. v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  5. Teamsters Industrial Security Fund v. World Sales, Inc. (In Re World Sales, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mediofactoring v. McDermott (In Re Connolly North America, LLC)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Mediofactoring v. McDermott (In Re Connolly North America, LLC)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API