Legal Opinion

Jermosen v. Smith

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

The procedures "followed in the adjustment committee proceedings challenged by petitioner conformed with the regulations governing adjustment committees then in effect. The *1026adjustment committee determinations resulted only in the inmate’s confinement to “less amenable and more restrictive quarters” for the purpose of maintaining institutional order and safety rather than as punishment. Thus, compliance with the minimal due process requirements of Wolff v McDonnell (418 US 539) was not mandated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gittens v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1986
  2. Lopez v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API