Hamelin v. Simpson Paper (Vermont) Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1DissentGibson, J.
I respectfully dissent. Although I agree that parties may contract to allocate liability and require indemnification for loss, I believe the contract between Vescom Corporation and Simpson Paper Company did not justify holding Vescom liable in this instance.
Two important principles underlying tort liability are: (1) a party that causes loss should be held responsible for the damage therefrom, and (2) holding the responsible party hable serves as an incentive to prevent future occurrences of similar harm. See W. Keeton, et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 4, at 22, 25 (5th ed.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Federal Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Colgan v. Agway, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1975
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Mason & Dulion Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.