Lempco Products, Inc. v. Phillips

The plaintiff’s agent and the defendants entered into an oral agreement for the delivery of a piston-reamer machine on trial, which the defendants agreed to buy if it proved satisfactory.

The defendants found the machine unsatisfactory, and this action was brought to recover the purchase price. From a judgment for the defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

The appellant introduced a “sales order” in evidence, which was executed at the time of the delivery of the machine and was signed by the respondent Leonard T. Phillips.

The appellant contends that the written “sales order” is integrated with the…