Knoedler v. Boussod
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.
The plaintiffs have brought this suit to restrain the defendants from using in New York city, or elsewhere in this country, the trade name of “Goupil & Co.,” or any words indicating that they are successors in trade of Goupil & Co. The facts are these: Several years prior to 1857, Messrs. Goupil & Go., of Paris, dealers there in prints, pictures, etc., had established a branch house in New York city, and carried on the business under the management of M. Knoedler. In 1857 they sold the New York concern to M. Knoedler, reserving the “ownership” of certain designated prints and pictures, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cottrell v. Babcock Printing Press Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
- Washburn v. DoschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fowler v. Printers II, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- J. L. Cooper & Co. v. Anchor Securities Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Hagan v. DundoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Brown v. BenzingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Stanton v. ZercherWashington Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.