Legal Opinion

R.J. Nicolli Painting Co. v. Potts

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 13, 1984No. AU-21PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOANOS, Judge.

In this appeal from a workers’ compensation order, appellants argue that they should not be required to pay wage loss benefits when claimant restricts his work search to union jobs only. We agree and reverse the deputy commissioner’s order.

Claimant’s restriction of his work search to union jobs only precludes an award of wage loss benefits, as an award of compensation requires a claimant to show that he has tested his employability in the open labor market after reaching maximum medical improvement. Exxon Co. v. Alexis, 370 So.2d 1128, 1132 (Fla.1978). We are not persuaded by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Exxon Co. v. AlexisSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Griffin v. Parrish Const. & Door ServiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. IATSE v. NesselroadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Alan W. Smith Co. v. GarnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API