Legal Opinion
Saposnick v. Kenig
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 7, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The facts in this case are not in dispute and as far as are necessary for determination of the question of law involved may be briefly stated as follows : David Kaplan and Michael Strouch owned jointly the real estate in question (property at 1833 Park Street, Hartford) which was subject to a first mortgage to a bank in the amount of $15,000, and a second mortgage in the amount of $9750 owned by the defendant Kenig. Kaplan and Strouch were the makers of the note which evidenced this debt. Strouch sold his undivided one-half interest to Kaplan and the latter executed and delivered to Strouch a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Homer v. Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
- In Re the Estate of GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Allen v. Home National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Dungan v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hansel v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Mills v. Tiffany's, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Gavin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Dime Savings Bank of Hartford v. BragawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939