Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Trustees of New York & Brooklyn Bridge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from trial term, Kings county. Action by Julia E. Rogers against the trustees of the New York and Brooklyn Bridge for personal injuries. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

Successive litigation, involving a consideration of the construction of the Brooklyn Bridge at its terminal in the city of Brooklyn, as it existed when the present accident happened and prior thereto, has produced from the courts conclusions which limit the range of discussion. In Langin v. Trustees (not yet officially reported) 42 N. Y. Supp. 353, we said, in substance, that negligence could not be predicated upon the construction and maintenance of the bridge as a structure. In that case the trial court limited the jury to a finding of negligence from a consideration of the single question…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holden v. . New York and Erie BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Boyce v. . Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Neil v. . ThornNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Brady v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tacoma & Eastern Lumber Co. v. Field & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API