Legal Opinion

A. G. Anderson Co. v. Chittenden Cider Mill

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 6, 1984No. 82-320PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

Plaintiff, A. G. Anderson, Inc., brought this action to recover the balance due under a construction contract with defendant Robert Chittenden, a principal of the Chittenden Cider Mill. Defendants counterclaimed for damages which, they claimed, resulted from inadequate performance by the plaintiff.

After a trial on the merits, the Washington Superior Court concluded that the competing claims offset each other and entered judgment dismissing both the complaint and counterclaim. Plaintiff appealed, contending that the court’s findings were inadequate, inconsistent, and incomplete. We disagree…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Economou v. EconomouSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  2. Gadhue v. MarcotteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  3. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. ConwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  5. Smith v. DrummondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peck v. Counseling Service of Addison County, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  2. Harman v. RogersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. Peck v. Counseling Service of Addison County, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API