Cortez v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, State Bar of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion
On Motion For Rehearing
In its motion for rehearing, the committee asserts in a point of error that we erred in taxing costs against it because it is exempt from payment of costs. Although the committee cites no authority and makes no argument under this point, we assume the committee claims exemption as an instrumentality of the State.
TEX.R.CIY.P. 448 before and after amendment effective April 1, 1984, provides that “in any cause reversed by the Court of [Civil] Appeals, the appellant shall be entitled to an execution ... against the appellee for costs occasioned by such ap-peal_”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kierstead v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Parker County v. Spindletop Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Childs v. Reunion BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Combined American Insurance Co. v. City of HillsboroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Glass v. Great Southern Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.