Legal Opinion
Eaves v. Georgian Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 24, 1933No. 22850PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
1. While the municipal court of Atlanta has jurisdiction over actions for a larger amount than a justice’s court, the procedure, so far as pleadings are concerned, does not differ from that of justice’s courts. Ladd Lime & Stone Co. v. Case, 34 Ga. App. 190 (129 S. E. 6). The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the suit as originally filed or as amended. There was enough to put the defendant on notice as to the character or nature of the plaintiff’s demand. Mayer v. Southern Express Co., 17 Ga. App. 744 (88 S. E. 403).
*38Decided May 24, 1933.
2. The court did not err in sustaining the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Forsyth Manufacturing Co. v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- McDaniel v. Mallary Bros. Machinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Kennesaw Guano Co. v. Miles & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Greene County Oil Co. v. McCaw Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Mayer v. Southern Express Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jacobsen v. MullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Selman v. ManisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Southern Savings Bank v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Bailey v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- B-Lee's Sales Co. v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.