Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Thompson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1969No. 3693PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARNETTE, Judge.

This suit began as a simple action by plaintiffs to recover the sum of $800 deposited by defendant with a real estate broker pursuant to a contract of sale and purchase of property. The sale was not consummated, and long after the expiration of the date for the act of sale to be passed, the real estate broker returned the deposit to the intended purchaser, the defendant herein. The plaintiffs brought this suit against the defendant for recovery of the $800, alleging it to be due them as a forfeiture under the terms of the contract. Suit was filed June 2, 1965 and finally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eota Realty Co. v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  2. Hoth v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  3. Stockelback v. BradleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Transcontinental Development Corp. v. BruningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. United Shoe Stores Co. v. BurtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howard L. Makofsky, Jr. v. Raymond C. Cunningham, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API