Legal Opinion

State v. Manning

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 4, 1992No. 92-35PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

605 So.2d 508 (1992)

STATE of Florida, Appellant,

v.

Lee Edward MANNING, Appellee.

No. 92-35.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

September 4, 1992.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David G. Mersch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

HARRIS, Judge.

The State of Florida timely appeals the judgment and sentence of Lee Edward Manning. The State raises only the legality of the sentence.[1]

Following a jury trial, Manning was found guilty of robbery. The State filed a notice of intent to seek enhanced punishment pursuant to section…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Burdick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Scates v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. State v. KendrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Norton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. State v. ConteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. State v. McEachernDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. State v. BrendellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API