Legal Opinion

PUTNAM-CORDOVANO, ROBIN v. CSX CORPORATION

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2011No. CA 11-01355Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum:

CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc. (collectively, defendants) contend on appeal that Supreme Court should have granted their motion for a change of venue from Niagara County to Chautauqua County. We reject that contention. “A motion for a change of venue is addressed to the sound discretion of the court and, absent an improvident exercise of discretion, the court’s determination will not be disturbed on appeal” (County of Onondaga v Home Ins. Cos., 265 AD2d 896, 896 [1999]; see 1093 Group, LLC v Canale, 72 AD3d 1561, 1562-1563 [2010]). In addition, general allegations of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 1093 Group, LLC v. CanaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Mroz v. Ace Auto Body & Towing, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. County of Onondaga v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Stratton v. DueppengiesserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API