Legal Opinion
Brazeale v. Piedmont Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided September 21, 1937No. 14533PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an action for damages, both actual and punitive, for personal injuries which the plaintiff, an employee of the defendant, claimed to have suffered in June, 1935, while working as a spinner in the company’s cotton' mill. She alleged :
“That while so engaged, a small steel ring or appliance known as a 'traveler’, by reason of being worn and defective, became disconnected from the machine, flew off and struck the plaintiff in her left eye, cutting, tearing and wounding same, and bringing about a diseased condition, and causing her much illness, pain and suffering and permanently affecting…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gosa v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Green v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Hice v. Dobson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- Lester v. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Gowns v. Watts MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Howell v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- City of Jackson v. ReedMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
- Hilton Head Island Realty, Inc. v. Skull Creek ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Norton v. EwaskioSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Keller v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.