Legal Opinion

Borenstein v. Blumenfeld

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1979No. 57710Published

1Opinion of the Court

151 Ga. App. 420 (1979)

260 S.E.2d 377

BORENSTEIN

v.

BLUMENFELD.

57710.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Argued April 5, 1979.

Decided September 20, 1979.

Robert N. Meals, Paul W. Bonapfel, for appellant.

Barry L. Katz, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

We granted this interlocutory appeal to determine whether the superior court erred in affirming the probate court's denial of appellant's motion for protective order. The motion for protective order was made in response to appellee's motion to produce appellant's federal income tax returns. Under the circumstances of this case, we have no hesitation in concluding…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Quillian; Concurrence · Birdsong.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Borenstein v. BlumenfeldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Oxford v. OxfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Estes v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Bailey v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API