Legal Opinion

Scott v. Stutheit

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1912No. 3316PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Yuma District Court. Hon. E. E. • Armour, Judge. -

1Opinion of the CourtHurlbut, J.

This suit was commenced by plaintiff (appellee) in the district court of Yuma County, against defendant (appellant), to quiet title to land in that county under § 255, Mills’'Annotated Code.

The complaint was filed February 9, 1904, and is in usual form. Answer was filed, denying allegations in complaint, and alleging title in defendant by virtue of a sheriff’s deed.

Replication was filed by plaintiff therein, admitting the execution and delivery to defendant of said sheriff’s deed, and defendant’s claim of title to the land thereunder, alleging however, as a defense, that, by force of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. American Central Ins.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R. R. v. NichollsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  3. City of Pueblo v. StantonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. Eberville v. Leadville Tunneling, Mining & Drainage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  5. Filley v. CodySupreme Court of Colorado · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BardmessNevada Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Scott v. WatkinsColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Scott v. StutheitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Scott v. WatkinsColorado Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API